Privatization and Political Accountability
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article draws some general connections between privatization and political accountability. Although the main focus of the article is to examine different types of privatization, specifically exploring the ramifications for political accountability of each type, I also engage in some speculation as to whether there are situations in which privatization might raise constitutional concerns related to the degree to which the particular privatization reduces political accountability for the actions or decisions of the newly privatized entity. Court-created constitutional limits on privatization concerning political accountability have antecedents in recent Tenth Amendment jurisprudence and not-so-recent nondelegation cases. “Privatization” denotes a broad spectrum of the relationship between government and the private sector. On one end, accountability is not likely to be a serious concern, however in other circumstances, such as deregulation of personal relationships and business matters, reducing political accountability is the point of deregulation, and the increase in personal and economic freedom is worth the reduction of political accountability. PRIVATIZATION AND POLITICAL
منابع مشابه
Privatization and Corporate Governance: Principles, Evidence, and Future Challenges
Unless developing countries embrace a corporate governance perspective, privatization is unlikely to provide the benefits of improved performance with accountability. This article introduces the concept of governance chains that can constrain the grabbing hands of public and private actors by providing information and accountability mechanisms to help investors monitor managers. Empirical data ...
متن کاملPolitical Incentives to Privatize
The scope of the public sector (i.e. what activities are undertaken by public rather than private entities) is a decision made by politicians. While there are economic costs and benefits to privatization, there is also a political benefit to incumbents: By privatizing today, politicians transfer future revenues (when they might not be in office) to the present. This political benefit leads to o...
متن کاملPrivatization in Argentina: When Accountability Suffered
Argentina’s privatization process, one of the first and most comprehensive among transition and developing countries, started in 1989 and lasted through the 1990s. It had distinctive characteristics: it was massive, fast and supported by the public at its early stage. It also resulted in the loss of accountability among the actors involved: the government, enterprises, regulatory agencies and c...
متن کاملThe idea of performance contracting or performance based contracting has become increasingly popular in the child welfare aren
The idea of performance contracting or performance based contracting has become increasingly popular in the child welfare arena. This isn’t surprising, in that it comes on the heels of two very powerful shifts in the provision of child welfare services since the early 1990s: a rapid growth in privatization and the emergence of major accountability efforts from the federal government in the form...
متن کاملNoise Trader Risk and the Political Economy of Privatization
The ‘noise trader’ model of De Long et al. provides a plausible account of the determination of the equity premium. Extension of the model to allow for privatization of publicly-owned assets yields insights into the positive political economy of privatization and into the normative question of how policies should be evaluated in the presence of mistaken beliefs. JEL Classification: E62
متن کامل